South Korea, Germany and Singapore are the top three most prepared countries for integrating intelligent automation into their economies, with the UK in eighth position.
That is according to a new report from the Economist Intelligence Unit and technology firm ABB, which ranks 25 countries based on 52 indicators including infrastructure and innovation.
It warns that artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced robotics are increasingly being integrated into business operations, and that more effective education policies and training programmes are needed in response.
This should prepare the future workforce for the greater number of human-orientated jobs that will be needed as robots and algorithms take on more routine tasks, the report states.
“The pace of innovation and job change today is so fast,” ABB CEO, Ulrich Spiesshofer, said.
“Augmenting human potential with technology, in a responsible way, while providing ongoing education and training, is an opportunity to drive prosperity and growth.”
The top 10 countries for automation readiness are shown below:
Of the 25 nations studied, Indonesia was ranked the least prepared for intelligent automation, followed by Vietnam, Mexico, South Africa and Saudi Arabia.
The UK scores relatively highly for innovation but falls down in the further education indicator for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects.
This is an area where most countries were found to be lagging, with the report arguing that automation and AI will create an even greater need for understanding these subjects.
It states that a successful paradigm shift in human-robot collaboration has the potential to free people to focus their time on higher-value work, leaving robots to do the highly repetitive, physically demanding and dangerous tasks.
Such human work is likely to include designing the processes and operations for the robots to carry out, and also monitoring and overseeing the automated work performed by the machines.
“The report showcases the success pattern of the future,” Spiesshofer continued. “We must take advantage of these recommendations.”
Upgrading technology is the number one priority for insurers around the world, according to survey of senior executives by software provider AdvantageGo.
21 May 2018
The insurance industry is increasingly struggling to find the right staff, with just one-quarter of workers in the sector prepared to use artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
16 May 2018
Financial services companies are the most likely to be targeted for privacy requests following the introduction General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) next month.
03 May 2018
Why InsurTech? A Pressured Insurance Value Chain
By Andrew Sagon, Andrew Johnston and Matthew Wong
InsurTech is a burgeoning phenomenon that is modernising the insurance industry. It is disrupting the traditional value chain whereby insurers offer loss protection, and shifting the emphasis to risk mitigation. Incumbents face disintermediation as investors in search of higher yields pour money into insurance-linked instruments in the capital markets. And entrepreneurial businesses are targeting friction costs and inefficiencies within every aspect of the traditional value chain.
Nimbleness and agility will unlock potential
By Elinor Friedman, Andrew Harley and Klayton Southwood
Recent Willis Towers Watson surveys in the U.S. have shown that P&C and life insurers in developed markets are taking seriously the potential of big data and predictive analytics to improve their businesses. Nimbleness and agility, rather than brute force, are likely to be key to realizing that potential.
Driven by technology, toolkits and talent
By Claudine Modlin and Graham Wright
Advanced analytics is helping some insurers offer innovative products and solutions. What do insurers need to know about the changing nature of analytics and whether it is worth the investment? Claudine Modlin and Graham Wright discuss technology, toolkits and talent — topics that may help you decide.
Risk transfer is part of a comprehensive solution
By Adeola Adele, Patrick Kulesa, Kevin Madigan and Alice Underwood
Given the dynamic nature of cyber-risk, taking a multidimensional approach that integrates board governance, technology solutions, behavioral change and risk transfer solutions can help reduce risk to a manageable level.